The News From Chicago
Feb. 8th, 2010 07:39 amI'm kind of tired of the redemption narrative as it applies to drug and alcohol use -- "I used to be an addict, and I'm managing it successfully" is one thing, but "I used to be an addict, and therefore I get a bye for everything I did while actively using" is another. When I lived in Charlotte, NC, the man responsible for buying voting machines for the county, who turned out to have been helping the manufacturer sell used machines as new to the town and pocketing a share of the profits, blamed it all on his out-of-control marijuana addiction. Too many people have suddenly discovered (I don't know if this is true in Lee's case) active addictions only when the scandal of their behavior hits the newspapers.
Thanks for the memories
Feb. 7th, 2010 01:30 pmI owe him my lifelong love of Dorothy Sayers, whom I encountered first from his Lord Peter Wimsey role. Carmichael was completely physically wrong for the part, but had an elfish charm that worked very well for the character.
Best political ad ever
Feb. 7th, 2010 09:29 amDemon sheep.... or Carly Fiorina?
The good bits are the first minute, which features some Terry Gilliam-esque animation, and from 2:31, which features a guy crawling around in a sheep suit.
Carly Fiorina's team's previous Internet hit was their carefully-tuned slogan, "Carlyfornia!" [exclamation point original].
Since, as a person of geek, I am painfully aware of the way that Fiorina arrowed HP into the ground, I am glad to see she's incompetent at hiring marketing people as well.
I wonder if we'll actually have a Democratic candidate for Governor this year? Not that it will matter until/unless we have a Constitutional Convention. Which we need, but which will require the universal disgust at the state of the state to be directed toward the root cause, an unmanageably amended Constitution, rather than toward individual politicians.
Project Runway, s7
Feb. 7th, 2010 08:09 amAnyway, I miss the days when we had a Santino or anybody else with not only a strong personality but a strong personal style; I loathed Santino, but he had both design skills and execution skills. This season, we have some people doing the prima donna personality, but none of them have the mad skills to back it up. (Seth Aaron, who does, seems to be quietly kind.)
So far I am down with all the auf's. Ping is a visionary who needs more than a day to execute her work, and who in any case has a specific palette that doesn't lend itself to Project Runway challenges. The first young lady I hadn't gotten a chance to know. I was rooting for Pamela Ptak, but unfortunately her work looked matronly and dated. "Truck stop hooker" pretty much summed up the dress that got her killed.
And then there was Jesús. Ah, Jesús. I disagree with MIchael Kors that taste can't be taught; on the contrary, I think that taste tends to arrive as life sandpapers off your little weirdnesses, generally by means of mockery. But Jesús is impervious to mockery and, worse, to teaching. He knows he's right, he knows his vision, and nobody can tell him otherwise. The problem is that his vision isn't outre or provocative; it's simply tacky. Bye bye.
I am liking Seth Aaron; he does have a good eye, and he has the execution skills to back it up. Emilio's first winning dress showed amazing construction skills, so I'm happy to see more from him. Amy Sarabi was frankly robbed of the win for her potato sack dress which was charming, well executed, and clearly showed its roots as a potato sack. I sighed in pleasure when her this week's dress came down the runway. I was also frankly amazed, because I'd been shouting all episode, "You never sew chiffon under time pressure!" But she did, and it worked.
I miss Santino. And Merlin. (the only good thing about The Fashion Show). And Ulli.
By the way, if you watch the show, you really, REALLY need to read the blog Project Rungay. Not only do the writers have good eyes and a flair for language, their commenters are first-rate, and include a few people with construction and marketing expertise.
Edit: I forgot Emilio, another strong contender in the quietly nice, mad skills division. And I love Anthony and want to have him to tea and adore him forever; I worry about whether he's going to be able to tone down his pageant aesthetic.
A Cultural Difference
Feb. 6th, 2010 09:53 amIt also contains ... duh duh DUUUUH! ... a toast rack. And here is where I realize that British, British-commonwealth, and all British-tinged cultures are INSANE AND WRONG WRONG WRONG.
This morning, my loving husband made me tea in bed, because he is just that nice, and at my request used the breakfast set. For the hell of it, he also made use of the toast rack, which we generally leave on the shelf. Two slices of hot buttered toast, lovingly sprinkled with Maldon salt, were rapidly becoming colder than Dick Cheney's heart. I hastily removed them and put them on the plate with the other two slices, still comfortably warm.
As I understand it, the toast dilemma is between soggy toast (stacked on a plate) and cold toast (stacked in a rack). I realize that tradeoffs must be made in this world, but it is completely obvious to me that everybody who isn't me has made the wrong decision.
* Mine is in the primrose-yellow colorway, not the green.
** People who say "twee" should go leave the room and talk about Zen teabowls now.
Northern California liberals
Feb. 4th, 2010 08:13 amAgain from the Times: In A Prius Preserve, Shaken Fans
Tim Ahern, a spokesman for the environmental group the Trust for the Public Land, said he had bought a Prius for his commute from Sacramento — about 80 miles east of here — for the same reason cited by many buyers: Mother Earth.
“I was driving,” Mr. Ahern said. “But I was also doing something good for the environment.”
But on Wednesday, he said he was stunned that the Prius might have problems and had called his Toyota dealer for more information. Unfortunately, he said, there was little information to be had.
“So,” he said, “looks like I’m riding the train for a while.”
Toyota: Ur Doing It Wrong
Feb. 4th, 2010 07:27 amWell, um. AsyouknowBob, there's been a catastrophic series of revelations about Toyota's longstanding problem with "sudden unintended acceleration", a.k.a. "Oh, my God, my car is out of control I am about to DIE". The U.S. Government under Bush didn't see fit to regulate (of course), and Toyota first blamed the users, then floor mats, and now stuck pedals. Outside observers strongly suspect the electronics, not least because some survivors have reported that things like switching into neutral and pushing the "off" button didn't work. Steve Wozniak took to the media last night to say "Yes, I've seen this and I can replicate it consistently"; he fingers the cruise control, which is electronically controlled. He also says that Toyota, and the U.S. government (under Obama, BTW), refused to pay any attention to his detailed and precise complaints. (He drives a 2010 Prius, by the way, which is NOT covered by the current recall.)
So, Toyota has at long last copped and ordered a recall of the pedals, and spent extra money so that Toyota dealers can offer their customers free car washes. And no doubt they've all learned a good lesson.
In today's Times (the news broke after press time)? Not so much.
It turns out that Priuses have a habit of the antilock braking not working. For the 2010 models, there have already been 136 complaints, "Many of the complaints are from drivers who say their vehicles surged forward or temporarily lost braking after driving over a pothole or another uneven surface. Many say it is a recurring problem."
So. Toyota, now scarred by its recent problems with not applying kaizen, is responding.
Toyota’s manager in charge of quality, Hiroyuki Yokoyama, said the company had identified the problem and corrected the glitch for Priuses sold since late January. He said the company was still considering what actions to take for cars already on the road and had not ruled out a recall. (it. mine)
Mr. Yokoyama told reporters that the new Priuses experienced “a slight unresponsiveness” of the brakes that he said was easy to resolve by pressing harder on the brake pedal. The problem occurred, he said, because the technologically advanced Prius has two braking systems, and a glitch sometimes prevented the car from transitioning smoothly between the two.
Let me call this out. Toyota knows there's a problem. Toyota hasn't decided whether to repair the cars people bought before the problem became public.
Speaking as a software person, I wonder if life-critical software experts were involved in the design and testing. Equally important, I wonder who at Toyota -- and it would have been a management chain -- decided to ignore a wide range of life-threatening quality complaints in the hopes that they were all user error.
By the way, I drive a 2006 Scion xB; I'm going to be a bit nervous from here forward. Fortunately, the xB couldn't accelerate beyond 80 if you strapped an Atlas V to the rear bumper.
Not. Yours.
Feb. 3rd, 2010 09:37 amWell, if you're the members of the Central Valley Baptist Church in Idaho, you:
- Promise children's parents that you're taking them to get a good education, and that the parents can visit them.
- Pile 33 "orphans" (see above) into a van and drive for the Dominican border, where you plan to
- House them in an orphanage that currently does not exist and
- Set up a Website promising that these children will be available for adoption in the U.S. and
- When you are stopped at the Dominican border, lie about your intentions.
- [edit] Blame Satan when people object.
One of the early actions the U.S. took in response to the Haiti crisis was to shut down all US-Haiti adoptions except those that were already in progress. People like Laura Silsby are the reason why.
According to these people, they were on a mission from God. If I weren't a Universalist, I would hope that these people do some time in Hell.
And the rollercoaster goes dooooowwwwwn
Feb. 1st, 2010 03:20 pm::bangs head::
It'll cost $500 to rebook; I'm not going to do that until the last possible minute, in case the damned thing turns up.
[edit: I found it. Whew.]
Lesson learned
Jan. 31st, 2010 05:05 pmBlessings, mixed and otherwise
Jan. 31st, 2010 02:03 pmYou would have to have a heart of stone not to laugh at a kitten who, playing in a paper bag, has gotten it caught on his shoulder and races three times madly around the house, bag in tow. (He dragged it off before we could free him.)
Jonquil's New Rule: If you haven't sewed it in ten years, that fabric is officially muslin. (Exception: silks and velvets.)
To close: Argh! Person in my house! Any moment now!
Does "edgy" always mean "asshole"?
Jan. 31st, 2010 10:34 amTwo snippets from today's Times:
Boys themselves, at a younger age, have also become increasingly self-conscious about their appearance and identity. They are trying to tame their twitching, maturing bodies, select from a growing smorgasbord of identities — goth, slacker, jock, emo — and position themselves with their texting, titillating, brand-savvy female peers, who are hitting puberty ever earlier.
...
“We consistently look at boys in a position of privilege and power,” she [Rosalind Wiseman] said. “But if you ask a 12-year-old boy if they’re in a position of power, they feel out of control of themselves, their bodies.” She added: “I defy anyone to tell me that an eighth-grade girl doesn’t look like she has more power and control than a boy.”
Neil Genzlinger:
But one pair is more striking, more revelatory, than all the rest: Spike versus Lifetime. Guys versus Gals. XY versus XX. And with each channel offering new fare this month — Spike introduced the gross-out comedy “Blue Mountain State”; Lifetime fired up a new season of “Project Runway” — it seems a good time to compare and contrast these two cable franchises. What do their programs tell us about the sexes? What deep-seated yearnings drive the male of the species? What hopes and fears motivate the female? Is one smarter than the other, and if so, by how much?
...
IN GAL LAND THINGS WEIGH MORE THAN THEY DO IN GUY LAND.
By “things” here we mean, basically, “women.” Spike’s shows are full of women who could easily be in Playboy and probably have been: gorgeous in that hourglass way, hair full and perfect. On Lifetime there is “Sherri,” a sitcom introduced last fall starring Sherri Shepherd, who is what is generally called full-figured. There is also “Drop Dead Diva,” in which a thin model who dies young gets sent back to earth but is placed in the body of a large-ish woman played by Brooke Elliott.
Plump women are almost never seen on Spike, and hotties are almost never seen on Lifetime. It’s a tough call as to which is the more cynical ploy: brazenly playing to a female audience that probably could stand to lose a few pounds or shamelessly playing to a male audience that likes to fantasize about women more gorgeous than actually exist in real life.
Dear Jan Hoffman: Adolescence is hell for everybody. You could look it up.
Dear Neil Genzlinger: When you use the offerings of a cable network to describe women's and men's tastes, it would be sensible to check the ratings first. Spike and Lifetime, far from reflecting the pulse of a throbbing nation, are cratering. One might even say deflated.
Dear Times: Stereotypes are not edgy exaggeration. They are clichés, things people already say, all over the country. Knock it off.
http://www.publishersmarketplace.com/lu
I would hope that the DOJ is looking into this; I have no idea what the laws on "restraint of trade" are, but this smells dubious (we won't sell your product X unless we can come to terms on the price of product Y.) But, y'know, IANA(antitrust)L.
That Amazon thing
Jan. 30th, 2010 08:49 amI am ambivalent. On the one hand, real-world bookstores curate their stock: they decide what will sell -- and what they approve of -- and carry only that. This is why I dislike many real-world bookstores and why, ten years ago and more, I shifted most of my buying to Amazon, where I could pretty much buy anything in print. Amazon has as much right to curate their stock as any other bookstore; it's just that lack of curation is what makes Amazon appealing to me.
This decision is in no way morally different from Comcast's deciding not to carry Fox (was it?) until the two companies could agree on pricing. There is a significant practical difference -- Comcast genuinely is a monopoly in most areas, while an Amazon customer can blithely switch to Powells or B&N, or, if lucky, a local bookstore. Furthermore, Amazon has not made Macmillan books invisible -- you simply can't buy them from Amazon. It's just that I have an emotional attachment to All The Books I Want All The Time, while the availability or otherwise of Fox leaves me cold.
I am cranky, therefore, but not shocked.
This left me curious. I was cranky in high school when I heard Holden Caulfield's experience described as universal. I know one of my female friends teaches Catcher every year with great success; I wanted to see if Salinger-love correlated at all with gender. (As usual, people who didn't read Salinger because Great American Author wasn't obligatory in their cultures, feel free to move along or chime in, as the spirit moves you.)
Poll #2170
Open to: All, detailed results viewable to: All, participants: 128
I identify as
Other/it's more complicated![]()
![]()
12 (9.4%)
Female![]()
![]()
112 (88.2%)
Male![]()
![]()
9 (7.1%)
None of your business![]()
![]()
1 (0.8%)
I will discuss it in the comments![]()
![]()
1 (0.8%)
When I think about Catcher in the Rye
I loved it![]()
![]()
10 (7.8%)
It's an important formative influence![]()
![]()
13 (10.2%)
I liked it![]()
![]()
27 (21.1%)
Eeeeh![]()
![]()
47 (36.7%)
I loathed it![]()
![]()
37 (28.9%)
Salinger? Who's Salinger?![]()
![]()
5 (3.9%)
Other, which I will tell you in the comments![]()
![]()
10 (7.8%)
When I think about Salinger's short stories
Who's Salinger?![]()
![]()
17 (15.2%)
I loathed them![]()
![]()
4 (3.6%)
Eeeh![]()
![]()
32 (28.6%)
I liked them![]()
![]()
16 (14.3%)
They're an important formative influence![]()
![]()
3 (2.7%)
I loved them![]()
![]()
16 (14.3%)
Other, which I will tell you in the comments![]()
![]()
33 (29.5%)
Tickybox...
is a god-damned phony![]()
![]()
46 (44.2%)
comes to an unpleasant end![]()
![]()
45 (43.3%)
is tucked up with The Eustace Diamonds![]()
![]()
28 (26.9%)
Daddy Long-Legs (the musical)
Jan. 28th, 2010 07:12 amThis makes it a challenging text to turn into a play. You could simply break the frame and play out the plot onstage, but then you'd lose Jerusha's wonderful narrative voice. It doesn't lend itself to the "Love Letters" treatment of having two people stand up and read their letters -- one of them would be just standing there and nodding for two hours. Something like "Dangerous Liaisons" (minus the sex; this is a girl's novel, dammit) would seem to work better, bringing the subsidiary characters the two main characters discuss on to the stage and having them act the scenes the leads describe. Daddy Long-Legs has some delightful and engaging subsidiary characters -- the heroine, Jerusha Abbott's, two roommates in college, her best friend, Sallie MacBride, and her eternal enemy, the stuck-up Julia Pendleton.
The adapter chose the first treatment. Jerusha speaks or, often, sings, her letters; Daddy Long-Legs -- whose real name is Jervis Pendleton -- mimes his reactions, sings harmony with her letters, and occasionally gets a number singing about how *he* feels. The original version of the play was a song cycle, later turned into a song cycle with interpretive dance, and the transition shows. DDL, the book, is all about Jerusha, about how she becomes an independent person -- very much like Jane Eyre, a person who is strong enough to refuse the masterful male's love until she's his equal. Jervis Pendleton is hardly present, except as a handsome young man flirting with a college student and trying to order her around.
Here's the problem. The lyrics are simply dreadful. I tried to remember some examples, but I can't. (Edit: This clip says it all.) Take it from me, if you heard lines A and B in an ABAB stanza, you immediately knew what A' and B' had to be, and you were always right. The rhymes were on-the-nose. The sentiments were on-the-nose. The songs themselves had almost no variety -- they were all pop songs at roughly the level of "There's Got To Be A Morning After". There was one memorable song with some tricky rhythms, about New York City, called "The Girl In The Window". My heart began to sink whenever Jerusha segued from one of the sharp, witty letters written by Jean Webster into the sludgy tosh written by the composer. Son, you're no Sondheim.
I had a very happy evening out with a friend,
movingfinger, who also loves the original novel; I'm afraid we spent it dissecting the flaws. I will say that the lead, Megan McGinness, is lovely, engaging, has a fine voice, and holds the stage for the entire period; indeed, I found myself watching her all the time, even when she was sitting quietly in the shadows while the male lead sang.A paragraph in the program had the author announcing that he didn't care if the show went to Broadway, he'd be happy if it was seen in community theater productions all over the country. Just as well.
The heavens speak
Jan. 28th, 2010 07:07 am
movingfinger and I were driving off to a new play (watch this space) and happily cutting up the character of an acquaintance. As the conversation drew to a close, we stopped behind a Toyota Prius (of course.)Movingfinger started laughing and pointed out to the oval sticker on the right of the car: MEOW.
I started laughing and pointed to the rectangular sticker on the bumper: COEXIST.
Much less ambiguous than a flock of ravens flying south-west.